Overview:
Ashwin argued that enforcing the elbow-flex threshold on the field is a challenging task without technological aid and proposed the use of real-time biomechanical tools.
Pakistan’s Usman Tariq found backing from Ravichandran Ashwin after questions resurfaced over his bowling action during the T20 World Cup 2026 clash against the USA on February 11. Tariq returned figures of 3/27 to help Pakistan notch up their second victory, but scrutiny around his action once again grabbed attention than his match-winning spell.
Tariq’s bowling style has drawn attention for its pronounced elbow flex and distinctive approach to the crease, sparking debate over his clearance at the highest level and in franchise tournaments globally. The issue was previously flagged by Australia’s Cameron Green during the recent series against Pakistan.
ICC should ban Usman Tariq for his illegal bowling action. pic.twitter.com/dYfSEFxmDv
— 𝐉𝐨𝐝 𝐈𝐧𝐬𝐚𝐧𝐞 (@jod_insane) February 10, 2026
The chatter intensified after Pakistan’s victory over the USA, as clips circulated online showing spectators mimicking the spinner’s bowling motion during the contest.
Usman Tariq is a chucker. How @ICC is allowing him to bowl? #PAKvUSA #T20WorldCup pic.twitter.com/QXFaKLHnIv
— Pramod Kumar Singh (@SinghPramod2784) February 10, 2026
Social media platforms were abuzz with reactions, as several users alleged that Tariq’s deliveries amounted to throwing and called for intervention from the ICC.
Even football doesn’t allow players to pause during a penalty run-up anymore.
— Shreevats goswami (@shreevats1) February 10, 2026
How is this ok? Action – all good. But pause ? That too while loading to deliver. This can’t be continued seriously ! #WorldCup2026 pic.twitter.com/gIgsjV7RlX
Shreevats Goswami entered the conversation with pointed remarks about the noticeable pause before Tariq’s delivery stride. Citing how football authorities cracked down on comparable tactics in spot-kicks, he argued that the action should not go unchecked.
Agree football doesn’t allow it!
— Ashwin 🇮🇳 (@ashwinravi99) February 11, 2026
While the batter can be allowed to switch hit or reverse without informing the umpire or bowler, after him/her commits to start batting on one side, why are the restrictions only limited to the bowler?
In fact the bowler isn’t allowed to change… https://t.co/AOV4OKhwcL
The debate took another turn when Ashwin countered Goswami’s view, backing Tariq and highlighting what he sees as an imbalance in regulations governing bowlers compared to batters.
Okay, let me make it as clear as possible. Firstly, the legalities of his action can only be tested at an ICC bowling action testing Centre.
— Ashwin 🇮🇳 (@ashwinravi99) February 11, 2026
Secondly, there is a 15° rule under which a bowler needs to keep his elbow and straighten it and to judge if a bowler is bowling within… pic.twitter.com/RbTkY6xJ3h
Ashwin argued that enforcing the elbow-flex threshold on the field is a challenging task without technological aid and proposed the use of real-time biomechanical tools. He added that Tariq cannot be faulted for adhering to regulations, emphasizing that the pause is consistent with his standard bowling routine.

